top of page

Bypassing Data Debt

Solving Sources of Inefficiency in your Data team

Time’s ticking, and while you’re grinding the gears to crunch your data, market dynamics are shifting. You feel it — the nagging inefficiencies: your analytics projects consistently missing deadlines, cloud costs spiralling with no proportionate value, and the “actionable insights” generated feel neither actionable nor insightful. These are patterns, symptomatic of a deeper malaise affecting your data analytics operations.

Let’s dissect this further. Maybe it’s the data pipeline; data ingestion takes an way longer than expected, and by the time it’s ready for analysis, the context has shifted. Perhaps it’s the ETL jobs, often failing or causing bottlenecks, rendering your real-time analytics a dream rather than reality. Your team is smart; your tools are top-notch. So why do these issues still exist?

The problem isn’t just operational; it’s strategic. You’re dealing with an ecosystem here — an intricate web of people, processes, and tools that should harmoniously churn data into gold. Yet, something’s off. You’re not squeezing the ROI out of your analytics setup.

Drilling for oil isn’t enough — it needs to be refined properly and delivered to the users when they need it

Data’s the new oil, they say. Well, you’re drilling alright, but you’re not striking it rich. Why? It’s a question of far-reaching implications, a problem often underestimated, frequently misdiagnosed, and rarely completely solved. Before jumping to solutions, often mistaken as the ‘next shiny object’ in tech, it’s crucial to dissect the very anatomy of this challenge.

The Root Causes

When problems persist, they’re rarely superficial. Peel back the layers and you’ll discover systemic issues. Here are the core contributors to your analytics struggle.

  1. Misaligned Objectives: Does your analytics team know the business KPIs like the back of their hand? If the analytics agenda isn’t mapped to key business outcomes, you’re essentially driving without a destination and your team will put effort into low-value initiatives.

  2. Skill Gaps: Ever found your team wrestling with a problem they aren’t equipped to solve? The allure of sexy, new tech can mislead. If your team can’t master the tools at hand, even the fanciest setup will sit like a Ferrari in city traffic — flashy but ineffective.

  3. Resource Misallocation: Analytics isn’t a one-size-fits-all problem. Throwing the same resources at real-time analytics, predictive analytics, and historical data analysis is akin to using a sledgehammer for both carpentry and demolitions — it’s suboptimal.

  4. Tool Overload: Stack fatigue is real. When you have seven tools that do the same thing, you’re diversifying energy that should be focused.

  5. Data Quality and Hygiene: Garbage in, garbage out. If your data is plagued with inconsistencies, expect your insights to reflect that chaos.

  6. Cultural Barriers: If decision-makers are not data-savvy, or if the organisation doesn’t prioritise data as a competitive edge, even the best analytics team is set up for failure.

Now, the temptation is to tackle these issues with conventional methods….brute force. More manpower, better tools, system overhaul. That’s akin to shooting arrows in the dark. The real cure isn’t symptom treatment, it’s identifying a systemic treatment plan that considers these interlocking variables and treats them as a whole. The problem isn’t your team’s aptitude; it’s the landscape of misaligned incentives, complex toolsets, and murky objectives.

To navigate this effectively, you don’t just need solutions. You need a framework — a structured, methodical way to sift through these interconnected problems. It’s not enough to know what the problems are; you must know why they persist and how they interact.

How to approach this problem

First off, let’s break the tendency to throw more resources at the problem. Often, it’s not about what more you can do but what you can do better with what already exists. Adopting a leverage-based mindset helps here. For instance, are there datasets or tools currently underutilised? Sometimes optimising the existing stack can offer returns as good as, or even better than, a complete overhaul.

Now, about those skill gaps. Before investing in new hires or expansive training programs, have you examined the leverage points within your team? Often, a minor adjustment in team roles, exploiting each member’s core strengths (research T-shaped people), can result in exponential gains. Does everyone in the team know each others strengths and weaknesses, and can therefore support each other’s weakest areas and leverage their strengths? The idea isn’t just to fill gaps but to capitalise on existing expertise — think here with a blend of the 80/20 rule and the principle of Competitive Advantage.

Standard wisdom will have you believe that the answer might lie in the newest, shiniest tools in the market. But hold that thought. Could it be possible to turn regulatory constraints into an opportunity? Is there a way to use existing compliance requirements to create unique datasets that offer a competitive edge? This concept, known as regulatory arbitrage, often goes overlooked but can be a game-changer. The hardest problems often yield the most value to solve, so stop dancing around the hard problems and use your team’s collective wisdom to solve them.

Let’s not forget ongoing evolution. You don’t just set a framework and forget it; you iterate, you adapt. In an environment of continual change, it’s essential to strike a balance between stability and risk-taking. Don’t get stuck in cycles of comfort, but also don’t leap at every “next big thing” that promises to be a game-changer. Treat your analytics operation like a portfolio — maintain a stable core but always have a slice that’s pursuing aggressive growth. It’s your responsibility to keep your organisation from falling behind, but that doesn’t mean always chase the newest thing. You need balance and continuous forward momentum.

What you’re doing here is chess, not checkers. The complexity is a given; the mastery comes in navigating it not with more complexity, but with focused simplicity. You’re not merely solving problems but building a resilient, high-performance analytics engine that’s geared for not just immediate gains but long-term value.

From Sub-Optimal to Optimal

Once you’ve navigated the tangled undergrowth of root causes and armed yourself with a solid framework, what does the other side look like? This isn’t merely about mitigating problems. It’s about creating an analytics powerhouse, a team that’s not just functional but exceptional.

Implementing this framework doesn’t only solve immediate challenges; it transforms the fundamental DNA of your analytics operation. Delivering value actually starts to feel easier. The initial focus may be on identifying leverage points and optimising resource allocation, but the ripple effects are transformative. The team starts seeing themselves not as problem-solvers but as value creators, people with the capacity to directly impact bottom-line results.

Imagine it. Your analysts are no longer just number-crunchers; they’re strategic assets, internal consultants with a deep understanding of business KPIs and the skillset to drive them. Tools and technologies become enablers, not crutches or hurdles. Now, when you explore new tools or data sources, it’s not out of desperation but from a position of strength. You’re looking to augment, not fix. You’ve essentially changed the default setting from reactive to proactive, not by mandate but by ingrained habit and aligned incentives.

Here’s where you feel the effects of the Barbell Strategy you implemented — your stable, optimised base allows you the freedom to make more audacious moves without betting the farm. Those high-reward, calculated risks you took? They start to pay off, turning into innovative projects that further cement your team’s reputation for excellence. But the real kicker? You’ve cultivated a culture that treats data not as a byproduct but as a primary asset. A culture where decision-makers don’t need to be convinced to take data-driven action; they demand it.

The transformation is holistic, affecting not just what your team does but how they think about what they do. This changes how they’re perceived within the organisation, influencing career trajectories, opening up opportunities for larger-impact projects, and attracting top-tier talent to the team like a magnet.

In sum, you’re not fixing a machine; you’re upgrading an ecosystem. The principles applied aren’t a patch; they’re the new operating system. So, don’t underestimate the scale of what you’re undertaking. Done right, it’s not just a department that gets revamped; it’s an organisation that gets revitalised.


bottom of page